Friday, July 17, 2015

Greece... and Italy, Portugal, and Ireland


Somewhat surprisingly, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras managed to hammer out a deal with the leaders of the rest of the Eurozone after a 17-hour marathon session in which there was actually a fear at one point that Tispras had fled the proceedings.  More surprisingly, the Greek Parliament responded to the deal – which is worse than the deal that the Greek people could have had but voted down – by approving it by a vote of 229-64 (with 6 abstaining).

The terms of the agreement (or the few that I could very easily find) were hardly surprising for a country in a budgetary crisis: increased revenues and decreased expenses.  In order for the bailout package to be sent to Greece, various tax rates will have to be raised, various tax loopholes will have to be closed, and retirement expenditures will have to be cut through the elimination of early retirement and raising the retirement age.

While there are still hoops to be jumped through, it appears that a Grexit has been avoided…

-          Quick Tangent – Why do we need a catchy nickname for everything these days?  It bugs the you-know-what out of me.  I think it started several years ago when people responded to a (relatively) mild economic downturn by calling it the Great Recession.  I will say that it was the worst downturn the United States has had since the Great Depression and therefore it’s almost worthy of such a nickname but was that the best we could do?  From the Great Recession to everything ending in –gate to #Grexit, we search far too much for something to fill up a hashtag so we might be able to someday say that something we said is trending… and I think it’s stupid.  Rant over.

My goal here is to examine what happened, why it happened, who came out ahead, and who didn’t (spoiler alert: Greece) and I’ll try to put it all in context for you based on what I know about the global economy.

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

Yep, we’re going to start there.  I always start with GDP because when you peel back the first layer of an economic situation, it’s the first thing you see.  It can be good or bad or “meh” but diagnostically, it’s a good place to start.  Slightly more specifically, it’s the change in GDP that we’re more concerned about.  If I say that the United States produced $17.4 trillion in inflation-adjusted goods and services in 2014, that doesn’t tell you very much.  However, if I were to tell you that the world produced $75.8 trillion in that same year and since 2003, the US GDP has grown between 1.66% and 6.67% (with one exception) and 2014 fit that pattern (3.88% higher than 2013) it paints the picture of a healthy economy.  Yes, despite what anyone is telling you heading into the 2016 election cycle, the US economy is healthy.

Moving on.

Sorry, I lied.  Before I move on, a quick note.  The European Union consists of 28 countries but for this analysis, we’re more concerned with the Eurozone which is comprised of 19 countries that all use the Euro as their currency.  They are, in very particular (alphabetical) order:

Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain.

When you look at the same picture for Greece, it doesn’t look quite so rosy.



While the entire Eurozone took a hit from 2008-2010 (like the rest of the world did), it managed to recover to some extent and stabilize their GDP.  Greece, on the other hand, peaked in 2008 and has dropped 33% from then until 2014 and that doesn’t even include any inevitable drops that have happened in the past year or so.

Unfortunately, as we peel back the layers, the picture only gets worse.  If you plot their GDP from 2002-2012 (no debt data was available for 2013 or 2014) and compare it to their total debt, it looks like this:

Compared to their GDP, Greece’s debt reached 164% a full three years ago and again, the picture hasn’t gotten any better in the past several years.

This is where we separate a little bit from the numbers and go to a place where economists (including me) would rather us not go.  The truth of the matter is that economics is based on many things that are concrete (or “scientific” if you prefer) but the most accurate definition of economics that I’ve ever heard starts like this:

“The science of human behavior…”

Human behavior is only so scientific and it’s one of the reasons why assertions from economists come with a laundry list of assumptions.  This isn’t to say that these are bad assumptions but they do exist.

There are countries in the world with worse debt/GDP ratios and all we’re talking about is Greece.  What gives?  Why is the debt in the US which is about 40 times larger than Greece’s so much more viable?  In many ways, the answer is simple; investors trust the US (a lot) more than Greece.

DEBT… HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?

When a country spends more money than it raises in taxes, it must borrow the money to make up the difference.  In a (mostly) free market global economy, that means that the United States is going to the same place as Valero or Microsoft do when they need to raise money.  If we assume that there are a finite number of dollars (or any other unit of currency you prefer), then that means that private companies have to compete for investment dollars with governments and in fact, this is exactly the case.

This is where the term “crowding out” comes from.  If the government runs a budget deficit, they are taking up dollars that could go to capital investment in the private sector.  Overall, not a great thing.  While deficit spending isn’t the worst thing in the world, doing so year after year can be a very bad thing because of all those dollars that could be going to the private sector where they know how to spend a dollar efficiently.  I may identify myself as a Democrat, but when I look at the ledger of the US for the past six or seven years, the economist in me cringes.

Ok, private companies don’t get the investment dollars they should, so what?  When a company or a country goes to the market and borrows those dollars, people do not give them the money out of the goodness of their hearts; they expect a return.  As is often the case, the return on these investments is inversely proportional to the quality of the investment.  While this may not make sense, it comes down to supply and demand (doesn’t it always in economics?).  Let’s say you are the US government and you need to borrow some money to cover your indulgent spending.  Given the fundamentals of your economy, lenders are tripping over themselves to lend you money and this drives down the interest rate that you’ll have to pay on the loan.  Meanwhile, in Greece, far fewer people want to loan you money since it’s riskier.






Sure enough, if we look at the rates that you could get for investing in Greek or American government debt over the past year or so, you’ll see exactly that difference.  The rate on a 10-year piece of debt in this country has been between 1.7% and 2.6% while in Greece, it spiked up to just over 19% before settling lower in the past few days.  The lowest rate on Greek debt was nearly a year ago when it was just under 6% and it’s only climbed since then.

OK, WE’VE GOT THE BACKGROUND NOW…

The best analogy that I can come up with at this point is that of a mortgage.  You go to a lender and come up with a loan and a payment plan for your house.  The payments are monthly and are based on the interest rate which is based (in part) on your asset and income situation and your credit score.  You, as the homebuyer (or as the country in this little metaphor) have an income that is in excess of your required monthly payments so you go about your business normally.  In this scenario, for curious reasons, your credit card debt gets added to your mortgage every month.  While you have enough to cover the mortgage payment on your income, when you add the credit card expenses, now you’re spending a bit too much money and have to go borrow more money (see where this is going?).  As you borrow more and more money, the interest rates keep going up and therefore the monthly payments keep going up.  In the middle of all this, you lost your job and had to find another one that paid about 85 cents on the dollar.

Left unchecked, this is the problem with large enough government debt.  We’ve become basically numb to the fact but it is a fact that if debt and interest rates get high enough, the payments that are due exceed a country’s ability to pay them.  When you combine the fact that Greece is not an economic powerhouse that produces huge quantities of goods that everyone wants with their increasing debt and then you throw a global economic downturn into the mix, you get to the point where they literally cannot pay their bills and then default on their loans.  This hasn’t actually happened yet but it is a very real possibility.

AREN’T THEY A MEMBER IN A MULTI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC UNION OF SOME SORT?

Why yes, they are, fantastic question!

However, that union exists between 19 different countries with 19 different sets of laws and sets of fiscal policy and national income profiles.  That’s where the rubber hits the road.  Greece has largely said through this that they want an infusion of capital (give us money!) with no strings attached.  Other countries with the ability to transfer this capital on short notice (*cough, cough*, *Germany*) have balked at bailing out Greece unless the loans are tied to fiscal reform in Greece.  In other words, Germany is saying something to this effect:  “Why should we pay your credit card bill when we know how to balance our checkbook and you don’t?”

So far, Greece hasn’t come up with any sort of a good answer although they did bring up the fact that they once were invaded and ruled by Germany and that they didn’t want to do that again… yes, they compared Chancellor Angela Merkel and the rest of Germany to Hitler and the Nazis.

A few years ago, Greece elected a number of officials that saw that they would have to seriously reform their spending habits and their tax laws in order to remain solvent as a country… and their measures, which might have turned around the Greek economy over time, were so popular that they were booted out of office in favor of a group of officials that seem to be flipping the bird to the rest of the Eurozone while asking for a blank check at the same time.

All of this posturing left Greece and the rest of the Eurozone with two options; bailout or (<sigh> I can’t avoid it> #Grexit.  Either some deal would be struck or Greece would have left/been forced out of the Eurozone and would have had to start printing their own currency.  Given the possible ramifications if Greece had indeed left the Eurozone, it’s likely for the very, very best that a deal was struck (even as tentative as it is right now).

WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THEY LEFT?

This is entirely supposition but my guess is without an infusion of capital from other countries, Greece would have gone into a depression that would have lasted more than a decade.  The first thing they would likely have done is defaulted on their loans, attempting to wipe their debt off the books.  That means that somewhere between 300 million and 400 million Euros that were owed to other countries and organizations would have evaporated.  Not a great first step when it comes to your newfound economic independence.

Greece would have started printing their own currency but how can creditors take their currency seriously when they have shown little political will to build a viable economy?  Interest rates on Greek debt would have skyrocketed; it would likely be nearly impossible for Greece to borrow any money until they can prove that they can balance their checkbook.  On top of that, their population base would flee to greener pastures (as has already happened to some of their educational elite over the past few years) and there would be nobody left to help build that economy.  Couldn’t they just print more money?  Go Google “hyperinflation” and then get back to me.

This is definitely the worst case scenario but I find it thoroughly plausible and apparently, Prime Minister Tsipras thought so as well given that he agreed to draconian terms to get this deal done with the Eurozone.  The single greatest cause for concern moving forward is that the Greek people vote the government out of office in favor of a further left-wing party that essentially reneges on this deal and puts them back on the brink.  If they go through, these austerity measures will be painful for Greece but I have a hard time feeling too sorry for them considering how long this has been looming.  Before you accuse me of being an elitist American snob, I will say the exact same thing if someday, we are being given unfavorable terms by our creditors.  Right now it may be farfetched but it’s not too farfetched to completely dismiss the possibility.

IF GREECE IS SUCH AN ECONOMIC DRAG, WHY DOES THE EUROZONE WANT THEM TO STAY?

There are two main reasons for keeping them in the fold and (more or less) forcing them to accept these sorts of terms.  First of all, if Greece leaves the Eurozone and defaults on their loans, the odds are good that the Eurozone will get back pennies on the dollar for the money that is owed to them.  Secondly, there was some speculation that there was some uneasiness within the Eurozone about Greece breaking away and doing well, free from the crippling burden of being in debt past your eyeballs to your neighbors.

Why should that matter?  Because the situation in other countries, specifically Ireland, Portugal, and Italy, aren’t that much better than it is in Greece right now.  If Greece broke away and was somewhat viable, it might encourage those countries to hold out for better terms from Berlin or they might also try going out on their own.  Personally, I don’t think this likelihood was very high but in holding their ground, Germany and Greece’s other creditors have sent a loud and clear message across the Eurozone; shape up or else… you need us more than we need you.

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS?

Phenomenally, it sounds like the bailout package will help Greece get by and pay their bills for the next three years which means that they have that long to seriously overhaul their entire economy or face this exact same situation (though probably worse) in a few years.  Greece came out of this the biggest loser by far simply because as I understand it, there was no debt relief in this deal.  They are not getting off easily by any stretch of the imagination.

The wildcard in all this is the Greek people.  Twelve day ago, they collectively flipped the bird at the rest of the Eurozone by voting down austerity measures as part of a bailout plan (actually, only 61% of Greeks flipped the bird… 39% voted for the measures).  I’m assuming they thought that confronted with that overwhelming display of solidarity, their creditors were going to fall over and give up the fight and forgive the debt (or at least give them the bailout with no strings attached).  To say they overplayed their hand is a gross understatement.  Germany and the other creditors moved the other way, further away from the compromise that had been on the table, realizing correctly that they had the (infinitely) stronger negotiating position.

How are the people of Greece going to react?  Are they going to realize their mistake and accept this bitter pill?  Are they going to burn Tsipras in effigy and throw the government out in favor of one that will ignore this deal?

The most exciting part of this saga for me is that these are the types of situations that economists can’t cook up in a lab to study (apparently it would be “unethical” or something).  What would happen if Greece split off?  Would their economy truly reach rock bottom or would another country pounce on their desperation and more or less annex the country (I’m looking at you, Putin)?  How many more times can Merkel be compared to the Nazi Party before all is said and done?

These are difficult questions to answer in normal, everyday life but this situation allows the possibility of finally getting answers.

PREDICTIONS?

One of two things will happen, in my opinion.  Either this will end very anti-climactically and Greece will agree to the austerity measures and the Eurozone will stay together (boring… good odds) or the Greek government will become the former Greek government and Greece will truly crash in a way that makes the past few years look like a cakewalk.


My bet is the former…